Everyone knows that the battle of technology is at it’s peak, the big giants are constantly coming up with new ideas, versatile theories and innovations almost every day. Intel’s contribution, the Intel Core i9 9900K (New Coffee Lake).
In early 2018 Intel was gong through a challenge, AMD was starting to capture a market of users with their gaming processors, boards and machines. Intel, with their attempts to stay on-top started creating campaigns, public awareness surveys and webinars to engage the community about their new “AMD RYZEN” killer. In turn, users started to eagerly await for Intel to launch something majestic and prestigious. And on October 1st, Intel pulled off two unprecedented moves presenting the Core i9 branding to the mainstream enthusiast Z-series platform (chipset) and revealing the first 8-core CPU for a mainstream machine, the Intel Core i9 9900K. Intel expects this to be the answer to AMD’s Ryzen 7 CPUs, at least on core count. With a $488 cost, the Core i9-9900K would serve to be the flagship of their new lineup, offering eight cores and 16 threads.
As Intel was still unable to fully scale their 10nm process (let’s call it their “development or beta” process – 4nm faster) so their new 9th generation processor would have to be based on the 14nm process that they’ve using for the past 5 generations. Of course, Intel was able to optimize it with every passing generation and those optimizations allowed Intel to make the Intel Core i9 9900K into a beast.
It’s claimed that it will run up to 4.7 GHz with all 8 cores pumping, with a 5GHz max Turbo Boost clock. All that with a TDP (expected temperature ) of 95W. It also comes with Hyper-Threading, and is expected to have 16MB of cache. And Intel knew that if it could create a processor that can run at 5GHz when overclocked, it would fully decimate the AMD Ryzen lineup. Except maybe in terms of value, that is.
The Clock Speed Really Matters – WHAT’s NEW THIS YEAR
The Intel Core i9 9900K is capable of being clocked at up to 5.0 GHz, and features 8 cores and 16 threads w/ HyperThreading. The Core i7 9700K has the same number of cores, but drops HyperThreading and runs at a lofty 4.9GHz. The Core i5 9600K is clocked at up to 4.6GHz and features the same 6C/6T configuration as the i5 8600K, with all of them continuing to work with the current generation Intel 300-series platform, as well as the new Intel Z390 platform.
Here are the specifications in a nice little table.
Processor Cores / Threads Base / Boost Clocks Cache TDP Price
Core i9 9900K 8C/16T 3.6 / 5.0 GHz 16MB 95W $488
Core i7 9700K 8C/8T 3.6 / 4.9 GHz 12MB 95W $374
Core i5 9600K 6C/6T 3.7 / 4.6 GHz 9MB 95W $262
The Gaming Guru – All New Intel Core i9 Monster
Without a doubt the Intel i9-9900k is an absolute overkill in terms of day-to-day desktop duties. In comparison with the i7-8700 for instance, we took a Z370 system and managed to Turbo Boost to a constant 4.68GHz, it would score a powerful 210 within the single core and 2028 in multicore efficiency, whereas the same Z370 w/ i9-9900 PC Turbo Boosted to 4.9GHz and got 212 within a single core and 2080 in multicore efficiency. This places i9-9900’s single core efficiency at around 15% quicker and its multicore efficiency at a large 57-62% quicker than the i7-8700.
Yes, the 9900k is the quickest gaming CPU around too, however it’s just too costly for what it’s – and that’s even before you begin to include the price needed for further cooling necessities. Instead, you’d be a lot better off spending that cash on more powerful graphics card and sticking with both Intel’s $370 Core i7-8700k or AMD’s $310 Ryzen 7 2700X. Both CPUs are infinitely higher value for cash then their rival Core i9, and nonetheless present greater efficiency for any high-end gaming rig.
Intel’s Core i9- 9900 vs AMD’s Ryzen 7 and what the benchmarkers found
“Game Mode”: If we compare the fact that the Ryzen Master Utility and the number of active cores in the AMD-based systems, all based on AMD’s recommendations and our initial testing on the Threadripper processors, installing the AMD Ryzen Master utility and enabling the Game Mode increased most results compared to i9-9900. But the results may vary for other AMD machines across Threadripper.
Cooler choice: Noctua (premium cooling components are renowned for their superb quietness, exceptional performance and thoroughgoing quality) has been chosen for the CPU coolers, due to having almost identical systems in the NH-U14S (Intel) and NH-U14S TR4-SP3 (AMD), which testers have show to have maintained a comparable thermal profile. Also, they found that without having to perform any overclocking on any configuration and AMD claiming it was a good cooler, they found the stock AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X Wraith Prism cooler had a small advantage over coffee series of Intel.
Memory speeds: To have complete parity across all systems, and to allow the Intel® Core i9 X-series and AMD Ryzen Threadripper to fully utilize memory bandwidth, they used 4 16GB DDR4 DIMMs on all configurations and found that Core i9 X-series is amazingly faster in performance and clocking
Quality settings: All games were configured to use the “High” or equivalent preset, versus “Ultra” or other presets, also to emphasize CPU over GPU performance. In the case Intel i9 was the winner again.
- 8 Cores/ 16 Threads
- 3.60 GHz up to 5.00 GHz Max Turbo...
- Compatible only with Motherboards based...
- Discrete GPU – No Processor Graphics
- Intel Optane Memory Supported; Maximum...
Okay now we can conclude that 9900k is the quickest gaming and an overkill for day-to-day desktop duties, but again it’s just a little too costly – BUT it really won’t matter because it’s about replacement not enhancement for its fans. But if you’re strapped for cash (and various other reasons, i.e installation of advanced cooling, etc) you’d be a lot better off purchasing a better graphics card and sticking with Intel’s $370 Core i7-8700k or AMD’s $310 Ryzen 7 2700X. What a name, Intel Coffee Lake!?